The Impact Initiative has closed. This website has now been archived and will no longer be updated.
The Impact Initiative has closed. This website has now been archived and will no longer be updated.

Blog: How social protection schemes can provide vital support to older people

Photo (cropped): Malawian family with drought tolerant maize crop. Photo credit: Anne Wangalachi/CIMMYT/Flickr licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
Oct 2019

Today marks International Day of Older Persons on which we celebrate the huge contribution that a large – and growing – demographic group makes to our societies across the globe. At the same time, we have to acknowledge that many older people live in poverty and vulnerable conditions.

In light of an ageing population, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide important impetus for greater focus on tacking poverty among older people, and for social protection to play a role in doing so. SDG 1 specifically calls for eradication for all people everywhere, and for reducing poverty in all its forms for people of all ages. It also refers to the implementation of social protection programmes and systems to include those living in poverty and vulnerability. As such, we have seen a greater focus on older people in discussions about poverty reduction and being covered by social protection interventions.

While social pensions are commonplace in many high-income countries, this does not hold in many low- and middle-income countries. In low-income countries, fewer than one in five people over statutory retirement age receive a social pension. But this is changing. Various countries – such as, Kenya, Uganda and Zanzibar – have recently trialled or adopted social pension schemes that provide regular cash transfers to those over a certain age.

These schemes provide vital support to older people, helping to afford basic needs and improving their wellbeing. But the effect of social pensions stretches beyond older people. They have positive effects on their families and the communities that they live in. Research by Brunel University in Lesotho found that pensions allowed for children to go to school as their grandparents were able to pay for school fees and uniforms. Advocates for social pensions also point out that older people are not merely ‘receivers’ of support but that they play an active role in their communities, and that the social pensions allow them to take on these active roles for longer.

In some cases, schemes are universal and offered to all older people. In others, they are targeted to older people living in poverty. Whether pensions should be universal or targeted is subject to heavy debate. Proponents of targeting raise serious concerns about exclusion of old people in need when restricting pensions to a small group that are considered the poorest and most needy. Mechanisms for identifying this group are often flawed and result in people being wrongfully denied a benefit. However, as pointed out by research by the Centre on Ageing at the University of Southampton, inclusive social pensions should do more than be universal. They require active measures to find ‘hidden’ populations who might not appear on official registers or household lists and would be missed out altogether.

We need to learn from the evidence - such as the ESRC-DFID funded research on pensioner poverty -  that shows that when older people are financially secure, they are more likely to remain active and be part of their local communities.



The Impact Initiative blog posts are either from individual researchers or from major research programmes. Some of the blog posts are original source and are written by researchers and experts connected to the two research programmes jointly funded by ESRC and FCDO: the Joint Fund for Poverty Alleviation Research and the Raising Learning Outcomes in Education Systems Research Programme. Other blog posts are imported from related websites and programmes. 

The views expressed in these blogs reflect the opinions of each individual and may not represent the Institute of Development Studies, the University of Cambridge, ESRC or FCDO.


The Impact Initiative welcomes comments.  To enable a healthy environment for discussion we reserve the rights to remove comments if they are considered abusive or disruptive. All comments are reactively moderated. This means that comments are usually only checked if a complaint is made about them.